Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 222.68

IMPROPER TAKING OF [MENHADEN] [ATLANTIC THREAD] HERRING. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2013-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with the crime of improperly

taking a [menhaden] [Atlantic thread] herring.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant took [menhaden] [Atlantic thread]

herring;

Second, that the defendant did so by the use of a purse seine net

deployed by a mother ship and one or more runner boats;

And Third, that the defendant committed this act in coastal fishing

waters.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant took [menhaden] [Atlantic thread]

herring, that the defendant did so by the use of a purse seine net

deployed by a mother ship and one or more runner boats, and that the

defendant committed this act in coastal fishing waters, it would be your

duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would be

your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 222.68 (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113-187 (e). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
2c6ca90c003610b104652f7406f40fd2e927bb7693180bb741a682acbb6c08c5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.