Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.85

EXPLOITATION OF [DISABLED] [OLDER] ADULT BY A PERSON IN A [POSITION OF TRUST] [BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ADULT]. FELONY.

activein force · 2014-06-01 – presentas-observed

For you to find the defendant guilt of this offense, the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant [stood in a position of trust and

confidence with a(n) [disabled] [older] adult] [had a business relationship

with a(n) [disabled]1 [older]2 adult].

Second, that the defendant knowingly [[deceived] [intimidated]]

[[obtained] [used]] [endeavored to [obtain] [use]] a(n) [disabled] [older]

adult’s [funds] [assets] [property].

Third, that the defendant intended to [[temporarily] [permanently]

deprive the [disabled] [older] adult of the [use] [benefit] [possession] of

the [funds] [assets] [property]] [benefit someone other than the

[disabled] [older] adult.

And Fourth, that the [funds] [assets] [property] involved in the

exploitation of the [disabled] [older] adult were valued at [one hundred

thousand dollars ($100,000) or more]3 [twenty thousand dollars ($20,000)

or more but less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000)]4 [less

than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000)]5.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant [stood in a position of trust and

confidence with a(n) [disabled] [older] adult] [had a business relationship

with a(n) [disabled]6 [older]7 adult], and knowingly [[deceived]

[intimidated]] a(n) [disabled] [older] adult [[obtained] [used]]

[endeavored to [obtain] [use]] a(n) [disabled] [older] adult’s [funds]

[assets] [property] intending to [[temporarily] [permanently] deprive the

[disabled] [older] adult of the [use] [benefit] [possession] of the [funds]

[assets], and the [funds] [assets] [property] were valued at [one hundred

thousand dollars ($100,000 or more)] [twenty thousand dollars ($20,000)

or more but less than $100,000] [less than twenty thousand dollars

($20,000)], then it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you

do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these

things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.85 (June 2014). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-112.2(b),(d). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
be6f99a115f7ae03f1b6b9bff86ec6db91a2ed1bf4c0a61c93e2c61de6737147
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.