Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.50

IMPROPER RECEIPT OF DECEDENT’S RETIREMENT ALLOWANCE. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2013-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with the [improper] [fraudulent]

receipt of a decedent’s [retirement allowance] [disability benefit].

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant had the intent to defraud;

Second, that the defendant received money as a result of [cashing]

[depositing] [receiving a direct deposit of] the [decedent’s retirement

allowance] [decedent’s monthly benefit under the Disability Income Plan

of North Carolina];

Third, that the defendant knew that the defendant was not entitled

to the decedent’s retirement [allowance] [monthly disability benefit];

Fourth, that the receipt of the benefits occurred two months or

longer after the date of the decedent’s death;

And Fifth, that the defendant did not attempt to inform the State’s

Retirement System of the decedent’s death.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant had the intent to defraud, that the

defendant received money as a result of [cashing] [depositing] [receiving

a direct deposit of] the [decedent’s retirement allowance] [decedent’s

monthly benefit under the Disability Income Plan of North Carolina], that

the defendant knew that the defendant was not entitled to the

decedent’s retirement [allowance] [monthly disability benefit], that the

receipt of the benefits occurred two months or longer after the date of

the decedent’s death, and that the defendant did not attempt to inform

the State’s Retirement System of the decedent’s death, it would be your

duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would be

your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.50 (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 135-18.11, 128-38.5, 135-75.2, 120-4.34. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
06dd85ed1e75d3c9e8e6cbe925c2fd9b0986a4347d79a845c11271a5fcf3b4ac
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.