NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.50
IMPROPER RECEIPT OF DECEDENT’S RETIREMENT ALLOWANCE. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with the [improper] [fraudulent]
receipt of a decedent’s [retirement allowance] [disability benefit].
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant had the intent to defraud;
Second, that the defendant received money as a result of [cashing]
[depositing] [receiving a direct deposit of] the [decedent’s retirement
allowance] [decedent’s monthly benefit under the Disability Income Plan
of North Carolina];
Third, that the defendant knew that the defendant was not entitled
to the decedent’s retirement [allowance] [monthly disability benefit];
Fourth, that the receipt of the benefits occurred two months or
longer after the date of the decedent’s death;
And Fifth, that the defendant did not attempt to inform the State’s
Retirement System of the decedent’s death.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant had the intent to defraud, that the
defendant received money as a result of [cashing] [depositing] [receiving
a direct deposit of] the [decedent’s retirement allowance] [decedent’s
monthly benefit under the Disability Income Plan of North Carolina], that
the defendant knew that the defendant was not entitled to the
decedent’s retirement [allowance] [monthly disability benefit], that the
receipt of the benefits occurred two months or longer after the date of
the decedent’s death, and that the defendant did not attempt to inform
the State’s Retirement System of the decedent’s death, it would be your
duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a
reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would be
your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.50 (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 135-18.11, 128-38.5, 135-75.2, 120-4.34. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
06dd85ed1e75d3c9e8e6cbe925c2fd9b0986a4347d79a845c11271a5fcf3b4ac
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.