NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.49
INCLUDING [FALSE] [MISLEADING] INFORMATION ABOUT THE INTERNET WEBSITE OF ANY TREATMENT PROVIDER WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with including [false] [misleading]
information about the internet website of any treatment provider with the
intent to defraud.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove
two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant [[included [false] [misleading] information with
the intent1 to defraud another person about the internet website of any
treatment provider2]] [[surreptitiously [directed] [redirected] the reader to
another internet website]].
And Second, that the defendant did so knowingly.3
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant knowingly [[included [false]
[misleading] information with the intent to defraud another person about the
internet website of any treatment provider]] [[surreptitiously [directed]
[redirected] the reader to another internet website]] (nothing else
appearing),4 it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not
so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it would
be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.49 (March 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-113.151(d)(2). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
00f9d53bdadd841f4ea223544a218807083adc561a95eebb51e08f075f57e314
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.