NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.45
[PROVIDING] [DIRECTING ANY OTHER PERSON TO PROVIDE] FALSE INFORMATION ABOUT THE IDENTITY OF ANY TREATMENT PROVIDER WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with [providing] [directing] another
person to provide false information about the identity of any treatment
provider with the intent to defraud.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove
two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant knowingly1 [provided] [[directed] another
[person] [entity] to provide]] [false] [misleading] information.
And Second, that the defendant did so with the intent2 to defraud
another person about the [identity of] [contact information for] any treatment
provider.3
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant knowingly [provided] [[directed]
another [person] [entity] to provide]] [false] [misleading] information with
the intent to defraud another person about the [identity of] [contact
information for] any treatment provider (nothing else appearing),4 it would be
your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a
reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it would be your duty to
return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.45 (March 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-113.151(d)(1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
1b285b0135be2c4ca9986436170a9d02d2cc506e13fbc7afc453e4243868597d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.