Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.42

MAKING A [FALSE] [MISLEADING] STATEMENT ABOUT THE TREATMENT PROVIDER’S [STATUS] [CREDENTIALS] [RATE OF RECOVERY] WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD. FELONY.

activein force · 2024-04-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with making a [false] [misleading]

statement about the treatment provider’s [status] [credentials] [rate of

recovery] with the intent to defraud.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove

three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant was a [treatment provider]1 [treatment

facility]2 [recovery residence]3 [[third party providing services to any

[treatment provider] [treatment facility] [recovery residence]].

Second, that the defendant knowingly4 made a [false] [misleading]

statement.

And Third, that the defendant did so with the intent5 to defraud any

person about the [treatment provider’s status as an [in-network] [out-of-network] provider] [the [credentials] [qualifications] [experiences] of persons

providing [treatment] [services]] [the rate of [recovery] [success] in

providing services].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant was a [treatment provider] [treatment

facility] [recovery residence] [[third party providing services to any

[treatment provider] [treatment facility] [recovery residence]] and knowingly

made a [false] [misleading] statement with the intent to defraud any person

about the [treatment provider’s status as an [in-network] [out-of-network]

provider] [the [credentials] [qualifications] [experiences] of persons providing

[treatment] [services]] [the rate of [recovery] [success] in providing services]

(nothing else appearing),6 it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty.

If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these

things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.42 (April 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-113.151(c)(2). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
dd8c098a40b80d26bfa8e1af9da3b63f30facf2510ad7ee9c2c9e47cf716029d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.