NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.37
FRAUDULENT ADVERTISEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with the fraudulent advertisement for
sale of residential real property. 1
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove
two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant [listed] [advertised] residential real property
for sale to another person. (Describe property) is residential real property.
And Second, that the defendant did so knowing that the purported seller
had no [legal title] [authority] to sell the property.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant [listed] [advertised] (describe
residential real property) for sale to another person, and the defendant did so
knowing that the purported seller had no [legal title] [authority] to sell the
property, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so
find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be
your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.37 (March 2025). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-117.8(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
dd216aa6db90fa0b2369471c6a4e8cbf0051c76a9ae5e104f7a298e085cff601
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.