Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.34

PATTERN OF RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FRAUD. FELONY.

activein force · 2008-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with a pattern of residential

mortgage fraud.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant with the intent that a [mortgage lender]

[mortgage broker] [borrower] [any other person or entity that is involved

in the mortgage lending process (describe person or entity)] rely on the

[misstatement] [misrepresentation] [omission]1 knowingly

[(a) [made] [attempted to make] any material2 [misstatement]

[misrepresentation] within the mortgage lending process3].

[(b) omitted material information within the mortgage lending

process].

[(c) [used] [facilitated the use of] [attempted to use] [attempted

to facilitate the use of] any material [misstatement]

[misrepresentation] [omission] within the mortgage lending

process].

Second, that the residential mortgage fraud involved five (or more)

mortgage loans. A mortgage loan is a loan primarily secured by either (i)

a mortgage or a deed of trust on residential real property or (ii) a security

interest in a manufactured home located or to be located on residential

real property. The mortgage loans involved were: (Describe each

mortgage loan involved, e.g., lender name, borrower name, loan amount,

loan number, date of transaction, etc.)

Third, that the mortgage loans were interrelated to each other by

the same or similar [intents] [results] [accomplices] [victims] (or)

[methods of commission] (or) [by other distinguishing characteristics

(describe other characteristics)]. In other words, the mortgage loans

involved were related and had continuity.

Fourth, that the defendant acted with the intent to [deceive]

[defraud].4

And Fifth, that the defendant acted for financial gain.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant with the intent that a [mortgage

lender] [mortgage broker] [borrower] [any other person or entity that is

involved in the mortgage lending process (describe person or entity)] rely

on the [misstatement] [misrepresentation] [omission] knowingly

[(a) [made] [attempted to make] any material [misstatement]

[misrepresentation] within the mortgage lending process],

[(b) omitted material information within the mortgage lending

process],

[(c) [used] [facilitated the use of] [attempted to use] [attempted

to facilitate the use of] any material [misstatement]

[misrepresentation] [omission] within the mortgage lending

process],

and that the residential mortgage fraud involved five (or more) mortgage

loans interrelated to each other by the same or similar [intents] [results]

[accomplices] [victims] (or) [methods of commission] (or) [by other

distinguishing characteristics (describe other characteristics)], it would

be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty

to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 220.34 (June 2008). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-118.15. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
7864ead1fbc802764ab67909bc46f5766ecff9bb3c442d93da8e5965c4cb491b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.