NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219D.20
UNLAWFULLY ENGAGING IN THE BUSINESS OF MONEY TRANSMISSION — ANY REASON. MISDEMEANOR.
NOTE WELL: The North Carolina Money Transmitters
Act is effective October 1, 2015.
The defendant has been charged with engaging in the business of
money transmission in violation of the North Carolina Money Transmitters
Act.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant1 engaged in the business of money
transmission2 in the State of North Carolina by (describe violation) (e.g.,
engaging in the business of money transmission in the State under any
name other than that which is authorized to do business in the State).3
Second, that the defendant did so knowingly.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant engaged in the business of money
transmission in the State of North Carolina, and that the defendant did
so knowingly and willfully in violation of the North Carolina Money
Transmitters Act, then it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty.
If you do not so find, or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of
these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219D.20 (June 2017). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 53-208.58(a). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
f9895fc7f4d0f90f79d5b5eb3f365c651c17b043a7f41ab61ce03ad8bb860000
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.