Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219B.60

CREDIT CARD FRAUD-CRIMINAL FACTORING OF TRANSACTION CARD RECORDS OF SALE. FELONY.

activein force · 2003-04-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with criminal factoring of

transaction card records.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant [employed] [solicited] an [authorized

merchant] [agent or employee of an authorized merchant] to remit to an

[issuer] [acquirer]1 a financial transaction card record of sale.

Second, that the record of sale submitted to the [issuer] [acquirer]

was not a record of a sale actually made by the [merchant] [agent or

employee of the merchant].

Third, that this record of sale was submitted without the express

authorization of a business organization or financial institution having

authority to accept such a transaction as payment for a sale.

And Fourth, that the defendant acted willfully and intentionally to

defraud the [issuer] [acquirer] [cardholder].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant [employed] [solicited] an

[authorized merchant] [agent or employee of an authorized merchant] to

remit to an [issuer] [acquirer] a financial transaction card record of sale

which was not a record of sale actually made by the merchant or his

agent or employee, and the defendant did this without the express

consent of the [issuer] [acquirer], and that the defendant acted willfully,

with the intent to defraud the

[issuer] [acquirer] [cardholder], it would be your duty to return a verdict

of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or

more of these things, then it would be your duty to return a verdict of not

guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219B.60 (April 2003). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-113.15A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
3898d106745708eaa33c10d1cb11bc148e5ba284abf9d839ce8338157f4abf05
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.