Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219B.31

FORGERY OR UTTERING OF A FORGED CREDIT CARD (FINANCIAL TRANSACTION CARD)-FALSELY ENCODED, DUPLICATED, ALTERED, OR UTTERED. FELONY.

activein force · 2003-04-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with [forgery of a] [uttering a

forged] credit card.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant

a. [falsely [encoded] [duplicated the encoding of] [altered the

encoding of] a credit card].

b. [uttered, that is, offered to another a credit card which had

been falsely [encoded] [duplicated] [altered]].

And Second, that the defendant intended to defraud.2

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant [falsely] [encoded] [duplicated the

encoding of] [altered the encoding of] a credit card [uttered a credit card

which had been falsely [encoded] [duplicated] [altered]], intending to

defraud, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not

so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it

would be your duty to return verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219B.31 (April 2003). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-113.11(a)(2). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
da80d315c038a69fe929a2d6fbc36237a4f3dea1ae162de4a0b31734e218273c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.