NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219B.20
CREDIT CARD (FINANCIAL TRANSACTION CARD) THEFT-USE OF LOST, MISLAID, OR MISTAKENLY DELIVERED CARD. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with credit card theft by using a
[lost] [mislaid] [mistakenly delivered] credit card.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant received; that is, obtained possession of
(describe credit card).2
Second, that the credit card was [lost] [mislaid] [delivered under a
mistake as to the identity or address of the cardholder].
Third, that the defendant knew that the credit card was [lost]
[mislaid] [mistakenly delivered].
And Fourth, that the defendant retained the card with the intent to
[sell it] [use it] [transfer it to someone other than the cardholder or the
issuer].
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant received (describe credit card),1
which the defendant knew had been [lost] [mislaid] [mistakenly
delivered] and that the defendant intended to [sell it] [use it] [transfer it
to someone other than the cardholder or the issuer], it would be your
duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a
reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty
to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 219B.20 (April 2003). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-113.9(a)(2). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
a2d969c3585870d7bf7c35e495e5b18fa80ae384c2e19b1e1463aca553cacaa6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.