NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 216.77
PURCHASE OF VEHICLES FOR THE PURPOSES OF SCRAP PARTS ONLY AND FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS MANDATED BY LAW. FELONY.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove seven things beyond a reasonable doubt.
First, the defendant knowingly failed to comply with the
requirements of the Department of Motor Vehicles, hereinafter “DMV,” to
maintain a record in the approved format of all purchases of scrapped
motor vehicle(s).
Knowingly means the subjective mental state of the defendant. A
person acts (or fails to act) knowingly when the person is aware or
conscious of what the person is doing (or failing to do).
Second, that the defendant failed to verify with the DMV whether or
not the purchased vehicle(s) [was] [were] stolen.
Third, that the defendant failed to report information on the
purchased vehicle(s) to the national motor vehicle title information
system within 72 hours of close of business on (insert day of purchase)
for the following vehicle(s):
[describe vehicles] (e.g., GEO Tracker VIN# 2CVBE18UoP6208)
Fourth, that the defendant did in fact purchase the vehicle(s) solely
for the purpose of dismantling or wrecking such motor vehicle(s) for the
recovery of scrap metals or for the sale of parts.
Fifth, that the defendant knew, or should have known, that the DMV
requirements were mandatory.
Sixth, that the defendant [operated a salvage yard] [was a
secondary metals recycler].
[A “salvage yard” is a business or a person who possesses five or
more derelict vehicles, and regularly engages in buying and selling used
vehicle parts.1 A “derelict vehicle” is a vehicle whose major parts have
been removed so as to render the vehicle inoperable and incapable of
passing inspection as required under existing standards.2]
[A “secondary metals recycler” is a business or person engaged in
the business of gathering or obtaining metals that have served their
original economic purpose.]3
And Seventh, the defendant knowingly failed to comply with these
DMV regulations.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant knowingly failed to comply with the
requirements of the DMV to maintain records in the approved format of all
purchases of scrapped motor vehicles, failed to verify with the DMV
whether or not the purchased vehicle(s) [was] [were] stolen, failed to
report information on the purchased vehicle(s) to the national motor
vehicle system within 72 hours of close of business on the vehicle’s date
of purchase, the defendant purchased the vehicle(s) solely for the
purpose of dismantling or wrecking such motor vehicle(s) for the recovery
of scrap metals or for the sale of parts, the defendant knew, or should
have known, that these DMV requirements were mandatory, and the
defendant [operated a salvage yard] [was a secondary metals recycler],
and the defendant failed to comply with these DMV regulations, it would
be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find, or if you
have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be
your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 216.77 (June 2019). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-62.1. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c230ab1d5270bdb01f1c4c038140d69c5f943ea2c1bde51dc39562e065451979
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.