Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 216.77

PURCHASE OF VEHICLES FOR THE PURPOSES OF SCRAP PARTS ONLY AND FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS MANDATED BY LAW. FELONY.

activein force · 2019-06-01 – presentas-observed

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove seven things beyond a reasonable doubt.

First, the defendant knowingly failed to comply with the

requirements of the Department of Motor Vehicles, hereinafter “DMV,” to

maintain a record in the approved format of all purchases of scrapped

motor vehicle(s).

Knowingly means the subjective mental state of the defendant. A

person acts (or fails to act) knowingly when the person is aware or

conscious of what the person is doing (or failing to do).

Second, that the defendant failed to verify with the DMV whether or

not the purchased vehicle(s) [was] [were] stolen.

Third, that the defendant failed to report information on the

purchased vehicle(s) to the national motor vehicle title information

system within 72 hours of close of business on (insert day of purchase)

for the following vehicle(s):

[describe vehicles] (e.g., GEO Tracker VIN# 2CVBE18UoP6208)

Fourth, that the defendant did in fact purchase the vehicle(s) solely

for the purpose of dismantling or wrecking such motor vehicle(s) for the

recovery of scrap metals or for the sale of parts.

Fifth, that the defendant knew, or should have known, that the DMV

requirements were mandatory.

Sixth, that the defendant [operated a salvage yard] [was a

secondary metals recycler].

[A “salvage yard” is a business or a person who possesses five or

more derelict vehicles, and regularly engages in buying and selling used

vehicle parts.1 A “derelict vehicle” is a vehicle whose major parts have

been removed so as to render the vehicle inoperable and incapable of

passing inspection as required under existing standards.2]

[A “secondary metals recycler” is a business or person engaged in

the business of gathering or obtaining metals that have served their

original economic purpose.]3

And Seventh, the defendant knowingly failed to comply with these

DMV regulations.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant knowingly failed to comply with the

requirements of the DMV to maintain records in the approved format of all

purchases of scrapped motor vehicles, failed to verify with the DMV

whether or not the purchased vehicle(s) [was] [were] stolen, failed to

report information on the purchased vehicle(s) to the national motor

vehicle system within 72 hours of close of business on the vehicle’s date

of purchase, the defendant purchased the vehicle(s) solely for the

purpose of dismantling or wrecking such motor vehicle(s) for the recovery

of scrap metals or for the sale of parts, the defendant knew, or should

have known, that these DMV requirements were mandatory, and the

defendant [operated a salvage yard] [was a secondary metals recycler],

and the defendant failed to comply with these DMV regulations, it would

be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find, or if you

have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be

your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 216.77 (June 2019). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-62.1. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
c230ab1d5270bdb01f1c4c038140d69c5f943ea2c1bde51dc39562e065451979
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.