Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 216.52

LARCENY BY [PRICE TAG] [PRODUCT CODE] [PRICE MECHANISM] CHANGE. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2024-12-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with larceny by [price tag] [product

code] [price mechanism] change.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove

three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant

a. [transferred a [price tag] [product code] [price mechanism] from

[goods] [merchandise] in a store to other [goods] [merchandise]

having a higher selling price.]

b. [marked [goods] [merchandise] in a store at a lower price than shown

on the price tag.]

c. [[substituted] [superimposed] a false price tag on [goods]

[merchandise] in a store.]

Second, that the defendant acted willfully and without authority, that is,

the defendant acted intentionally and without justification or excuse.

And Third, that the defendant presented the [goods] [merchandise] for

purchase at the changed lower price.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant willfully and without authority

a. [transferred a [price tag] [product code] [price mechanism] from

[goods] [merchandise] in a store to other [goods] [merchandise]

having a higher selling price.]

b. [marked [goods] [merchandise] in a store at a lower price than shown

on the price tag.]

c. [[substituted] [superimposed] a false price tag on [goods]

[merchandise] in a store], and then presented the [goods]

[merchandise] for purchase at the changed lower price, it would be

your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have

a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things it would be your

duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

NOTE WELL: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-72.1(e) changes the

misdemeanor offense classification for subsequent convictions

determined at the sentencing hearing.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 216.52 (Replacement December 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-72.1(d). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
bfb1d9415fe1b34559612801a89a355fa714ef899e1b079e1098d442f279403a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.