Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 210.97

[CONSENTING TO] [PERMITTING] THE MUTILATION OF THE FEMALE GENITALS OF A CHILD LESS THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE. FELONY.

activein force · 2020-06-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-28.1(e),

a surgical operation is not a violation of this section if

the operation either: (1) is necessary to the health of

the person on whom it is performed and it is performed

by a person licensed in the State as a medical

practitioner; or (2) is performed on a person in labor

who has just given birth and is performed for medical

purposes connected with that labor or birth by a person

licensed in the state as a medical practitioner or

certified nurse midwife, or a person in training to

become licensed as a medical practitioner or certified

nurse midwife.

NOTE WELL: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-28.1(f) provides that

it is not a defense to prosecution under this section

that the person on whom the circumcision, excision, or

infibulation is performed, or any other person, believes

that the circumcision, excision, or infibulation is

required as a matter of custom or ritual, or that the

person on whom the circumcision, excision, or

infibulation is performed consented to the circumcision,

excision, or infibulation.

The defendant has been charged with [consenting to] [permitting]

the mutilation of [the whole] (or) [any part] of the [labia majora] [labia

minora] (or) [clitoris] of a child less than 18 years of age.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant was a [parent of] [person providing care

to] [person providing supervision to] a child less than 18 years of age;

And Second, that the defendant [consented to] [permitted] the

[circumcision] [excision] [infibulation] of [the whole] (or) [any part of the]

[labia majora] [labia minora] [clitoris] of that child.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant was a [parent of] [person providing

care to] [person providing supervision to] a child less than 18 years of

age, and [consented to] [permitted] the [circumcision] [excision]

[infibulation] of the [labia majora] [labia minora] [clitoris] of that child it

would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or

have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be

your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 210.97 (June 2020). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-28.1. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
8ff255a091a4832cc19ff19eb98f2fb7dc9826e9f40902db8b89fba6b47b2b01
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.