NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 210.89
PROMOTING TRAVEL FOR UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONDUCT. FELONY.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant [sold] [offered to sell] travel services1
And Second, that the defendant knew that the travel services
included travel [for the purpose(s) of committing (name and define the
offense and enumerate its elements using the Pattern Jury Instruction for
that offense)2 in this State] (or) [for the purpose of engaging in conduct
that would constitute (name and define the offense and enumerate its
elements using the Pattern Jury Instruction for that offense) if occurring
within this State].
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date that the defendant [sold] [offered to sell] travel
services and that the defendant knew that the travel services included
travel [for the purpose(s) of committing (name offense, e.g. prostitution)
in this State] (or) [for the purpose of engaging in conduct that would
constitute (name offense) if occurring within this State], it would be your
duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a
reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty
to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 210.89 (June 2020). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.1(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c83ec148a7a8323295ed8d048ac60594ac2bafa2ca569693d785f4a621694dad
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.