Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 208.95A

ASSAULT WITH A FIREARM OR OTHER DEADLY WEAPON UPON EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PERSONNEL. FELONY.

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with assault with a [firearm] [deadly

weapon] upon an emergency medical services person while such person was

in the performance of his duties.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove

five things beyond a reasonable doubt.

First, that the defendant assaulted the victim by intentionally2 (and

without justification or excuse)3 (describe assault).

Second, that the defendant used a [firearm. (Describe firearm) is a

firearm] [deadly weapon. A deadly weapon is a weapon which is likely to cause

death or serious bodily injury. In determining whether (name object) is a

deadly weapon, you should consider the nature of (name object), the manner

in which it was used, and the size and strength of the defendant as compared

to the victim].

Third, that the victim was an emergency medical services person.

Fourth, that the defendant knew or had reasonable grounds to believe

that the victim was an emergency medical services person.

And Fifth, that the victim was [discharging] [attempting to discharge]

an official duty. (Describe what victim was doing, e.g., providing care for a

patient) is an official duty of an emergency medical services person.4

NOTE WELL: If self-defense is an issue, use N.C.P.I—Crim.

308.45.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant intentionally (and without justification

or excuse) (describe assault) the victim with a [firearm] [(name object) (and

that (name object) was a deadly weapon)5], and that the victim was an

emergency medical services person, who was [discharging] [attempting to

discharge] an official duty, and that the defendant knew or had reasonable

grounds to believe that the victim was an emergency medical services person,

it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. However, if you do not so

find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be

your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.6

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 208.95A (Replacement January 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-34.6. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
9d8c44ec2b2313ef4db21c328e31fbfa1b0d50eb094a464c7d73f9b914d57006
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.