Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 208.90E

DISCHARGING A BARRELED WEAPON INTO OCCUPIED VEHICLE IN OPERATION. FELONY.

activein force · 2011-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with discharging a barreled

weapon1 into an occupied [vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft] [(describe other

conveyance)] while in operation.2

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant willfully or wantonly discharged a barreled

weapon into a [vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft] [(describe other

conveyance)] (without justification or excuse).3 An act is willful or wanton

when it is done intentionally with knowledge or a reasonable ground to

believe that the act would endanger the rights or safety or others. A

barreled weapon is a weapon capable of discharging shot, bullets,

pellets, or other missiles at a muzzle velocity of at least 600 feet per

second.

Second, that the [vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft] [(describe other

conveyance)] was occupied by one or more persons at the time that the

barreled weapon was discharged.

Third, that the defendant [knew] [had reasonable grounds to

believe] that the [vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft] [(describe other

conveyance)] was occupied by one or more persons.

And Fourth, that the [vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft] [(describe other

conveyance)] was in operation.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant willfully or wantonly discharged a

barreled weapon into a [vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft] [(describe other

conveyance)] (without justification or excuse)4 while it was occupied by

one or more persons, and that the defendant [knew] [had reasonable

grounds to believe] that it was occupied by one or more persons and that

the [vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft] [(describe other conveyance)] was in

operation, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do

not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things,

it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 208.90E (June 2011). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-34.1(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
fb99a49269f5b8cd516e2480af88417dcf89b970ac0ff831b6a558f1027590ed
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.