Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.97

SEXUAL [CONTACT] [PENETRATION] UNDER PRETEXT OF MEDICAL TREATMENT – REPRESENTATIONS. FELONY.

activein force · 2020-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with sexual [contact]

[penetration] under pretext of medical treatment.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the state must

prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant undertook medical treatment of a patient.

Medical treatment includes an examination or procedure. A patient is a

person who has undergone or is seeking to undergo medical treatment.

Second, that, in the course of that medical treatment, the

defendant represented to the patient that sexual [contact] [penetration]

between the defendant and the patient [was necessary] [would be

beneficial to the patient's health].

[Sexual contact is the intentional touching of a person's intimate

parts or the intentional touching of the clothing covering the immediate

area of the person's intimate parts, if that intentional touching can

reasonably be construed as being for the purpose of sexual arousal or

gratification, done for a sexual purpose, or done in a sexual manner.]

[Sexual penetration is [sexual intercourse] [cunnilingus] [fellatio]

[anal intercourse] [any intrusion, however slight, of any part of a

person's body or of any object into the genital or anal openings of

another person's body, regardless of whether semen is emitted, if that

intrusion can reasonably be construed as being for the purpose of sexual

arousal or gratification, done for a sexual purpose, or done in a sexual

manner.]

And Third, that the defendant induced the patient to engage in

sexual [contact] [penetration] with the defendant by means of the

representation.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on

or about the alleged date the defendant undertook medical treatment of

a patient, that in the course of that medical treatment the defendant

represented to the patient that sexual [contact] [penetration] between

the defendant and the patient [was necessary] [would be beneficial to

the patient's health], and that the defendant induced the patient to

engage in sexual [contact] [penetration] with the defendant by means of

the representation, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If

you do not so find, or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of

these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.97 (June 2020). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.33A(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
9768f3454e5bf5c7fd80bd5d9f41a33182d8f281149f9ff2dc2dda89b897229f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.