NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.95
KNOWINGLY AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY [REMOVING] [DESTROYING] [CIRCUMVENTING OPERATION OF] AN ELECTRONIC MONITORING DEVICE.
The defendant has been charged with knowingly and without
authority [removing] [destroying] [circumventing the operation of] an
electronic monitoring device.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant knowingly and without authority
(A) [[removed] [destroyed] [circumvented the operation of] an
electronic monitoring device]
(B) [[requested] [solicited] another person to [remove] [destroy]
[circumvent the operation of] an electronic monitoring
device.]
Second, that the electronic device1 was used for the purpose of
monitoring a person for the purpose of [a house arrest program] [a
condition of bond or pretrial release][a condition of probation][a
condition of parole][a condition of post-release supervision].
And Third, that the defendant [was required to comply with
electronic monitoring as a result of a conviction for a criminal offense]
[was required to comply with electronic monitoring as a condition of
bond or pretrial release].2
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on
or about the alleged date the defendant knowingly and without
authority
(A) [[removed] [destroyed] [circumvented the operation of] an
electronic monitoring device]
(B) [requested] [solicited] another person to [remove] [destroy]
[circumvent the operation of] an electronic monitoring
device],
that the monitoring device was used for the purpose of monitoring a
person pursuant to [a house arrest program][a condition of bond or
pretrial release][a condition of probation][a condition of parole][a
condition of post-release supervision], and that the defendant [was
required to comply with electronic monitoring as a result of a conviction
for a criminal offense] [was required to comply with electronic monitoring
as a condition of bond or pretrial release], it would be your duty to
return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable
doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return
a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.95 (June 2010). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-226.3. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
85e6bceafc70c0263fac03e9c3534d7c730859fc17ba3f7fba706cbbaa190edb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.