NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.80A
FELONIOUS SEXUAL ACTIVITY INVOLVING STUDENTS (BY TEACHER, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR, STUDENT TEACHER, SCHOOL SAFETY OFFICER, COACH). (OFFENSES PRIOR TO DEC. 1, 2015) FELONY.
NOTE WELL: School safety officers were added to the statute
effective December 1, 2003, and are covered by the statute for
offenses committed on or after that date.
This instruction is valid for offenses committed before
December 1, 2015. For offenses committed on or after
December 1, 2015, use N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.80A.1.
The defendant has been charged with felonious sexual activity with a
student.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the alleged victim was a student.1
Second, that the defendant was a [teacher] [school administrator]
[student teacher] [school safety officer]2 [coach] at the same school3 as the
alleged victim.
Third, that the defendant:
a) Engaged in vaginal intercourse with the alleged victim. Vaginal
intercourse is penetration, however slight, of the female sex
organ by the male sex organ. (The actual emission of semen is
not necessary.)
b) Engaged in a sexual act with the alleged victim. A sexual act
means:
1) [cunnilingus, which is any touching, however slight, by the
lips or tongue of one person to any part of the female sex
organ of another.]4
2) [fellatio, which is any touching, by the lips or tongue of
one person and the male sex organ of another.]5
3) [analingus, which is any contact between the tongue or
lips of one person and the anus of another.]
4) [anal intercourse, which is any penetration, however slight,
of the anus of one person by the male sex organ of
another.]
5) [any penetration, however slight, by an object into the
[genital] [anal] opening of a person's body.]6
And Fourth, that this act occurred [during] [after] the time the
defendant and the alleged victim were present together in the same school.7
(Consent is no defense to this charge.)
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the alleged victim was a student, that the defendant
was a [teacher] [school administrator] [student teacher] [school safety
officer] [coach] at the same school as the alleged victim, that the defendant
engaged in [vaginal intercourse] [a sexual act] with the alleged victim, and
that this act occurred [during] [after] the time the defendant and the alleged
victim were present together in the same school, it would be your duty to
return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt
as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict
of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.80A (Replacement June 2016). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.7. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
300ec5b16413748f1b6957d46c251dbb277274a464baab4dd5484b2e7e181691
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.