NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.78
INTENTIONALLY [TAMPERING WITH] [REMOVING] [VANDALIZING] [INTERFERING WITH THE PROPER FUNCTIONING OF] A SATELLITE-BASED MONITORING DEVICE. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with intentionally [tampering with]
[removing] [vandalizing] [interfering with the proper functioning of] a
satellite-based monitoring device.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant was enrolled in a satellite-based monitoring
program 1.
And Second, that the defendant intentionally 2 [tampered with]
[removed] [vandalized] [interfered with the proper functioning of] a
satellite-based monitoring device issued pursuant to a satellite-based
monitoring program.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant was enrolled in a satellite-based
monitoring program and intentionally [tampered with] [removed]
[vandalized] [interfered with the functioning of] the satellite- based
monitoring device issued pursuant to the program, it would be your duty to
return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as
to one or both of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of
not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.78 (Replacement June 2008). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.44(a). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
5e5c89a952b1840472e00431404d2758b864faa456196eb2d956ed2f893cc85b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.