Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.20A

SECOND DEGREE RAPE - FORCE (ALLEGED VICTIM ASLEEP OR SIMILARLY INCAPACITATED). (OFFENSES PRIOR TO DEC. 1, 2015) FELONY.

activein force · 2020-06-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: This instruction is intended for use where

there is some evidence that the alleged victim was

asleep or similarly incapacitated. Where there are no

facts supporting the conclusion that the alleged victim

was asleep or otherwise incapacitated, use N.C.P.I.—

Crim. 207.20.

This instruction is valid for offenses committed before

December 1, 2015. For offenses committed on or after

December 1, 2015, use N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.20A.1.

The defendant has been charged with second degree rape.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the state must

prove three (four) things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant engaged in vaginal intercourse with the

alleged victim. Vaginal intercourse is penetration, however slight, of the

female sex organ by the male sex organ. (The actual emission of semen

is not necessary.)

Second, that at this time, the alleged victim was asleep or

similarly incapacitated.

(And) Third, that the alleged victim did not consent and it was

against the alleged victim’s will. (Consent induced by fear is not consent

in law.)1

NOTE WELL: Marriage is no longer a defense where

the alleged crime was committed after July 5, 1993.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.8 (1993). Do not give the

fourth element for offenses occurring after July 5,

1993.

(And Fourth, that the defendant and the alleged victim were

married but were living separate and apart.)

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant engaged in vaginal intercourse

with the alleged victim, that at that time the alleged victim was asleep

or similarly incapacitated, and that the alleged victim did not consent

and it was against the alleged victim’s will, (and that the defendant and

the alleged victim were married but were living separate and apart), it

would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or

have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be

your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.2

NOTE WELL: In an appropriate case the judge should

use N.C.P.I.—Crim. 201.10 to charge on an attempted

second degree rape as lesser included offense under

this charge. See N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.10 for guidance.

NOTE WELL: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15-144.1 provides that

an indictment for rape in the first degree will support

a verdict of guilty of rape in the first degree, rape in

the second degree, attempted rape or assault on a

female.

But see, S. v. Wortham, 318 N.C. 669 (1987), where

the defendant was indicted for attempted second

degree rape, the North Carolina Supreme Court held

that assault on a female is not a lesser included

offense of attempted rape, because:

(1) An assault on a female is not legally the same as

the overt act required in attempted rape; and

(2) The defendant in the crime of assault on a female

must be first, a male, and second, at least 18

years old. Neither of these is an element of

attempted rape.

Simple Assault may still be an appropriate lesser

included offense. If so, use N.C.P.I.—Crim. 208.40.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 207.20A (Replacement June 2020). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.3. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
c188ee0b0b4d17e19433b922cd54e2ee32e6216f5c600ddce14f7aa8f26edba2
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.