Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 206.74

DEATH BY DISTRIBUTION THROUGH UNLAWFUL DELIVERY OF CERTAIN CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. FELONY.

activein force · 2024-03-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-18.4(f) provides that nothing in

this section shall be construed to restrict or interfere with the

rights and immunities provided under the Samaritan Protection in

N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-96.2. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-18.4(g) provides

that this section does not apply to lawful distribution pursuant to

a valid prescription.

The defendant has been charged with death by distribution through

unlawful delivery of certain controlled substances.1

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove

three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant unlawfully delivered (a) controlled

substance(s).2 (Name controlled substance(s)) [is a] [are] controlled

substance(s).

Second, that the ingestion of (that) (these) controlled substance(s)

caused the death of the user.

And Third, that the defendant’s unlawful delivery of (the) controlled

substance(s) was the proximate cause of the user’s death. A proximate cause

is a real cause, a cause without which the user’s death would not have

occurred, and one that a reasonably careful and prudent person could foresee

would probably produce such [injury] [damage] or some similar injurious

result. (The defendant’s act need not have been the only cause, nor the

nearest cause. It is sufficient if it occurred in combination with some other

cause, acting at the same time, that caused the death of the user).

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant unlawfully delivered (a) controlled

substance(s), (name controlled substance(s)) [is a] [are] controlled

substance(s), that the ingestion of (that) (these) controlled substance(s)

caused the death of the user, and that the defendant’s unlawful delivery of

the controlled substance(s) was the proximate cause of the user’s death, it

would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty of death by distribution through

unlawful delivery of (a) certain controlled substance(s). If you do not so find

or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your

duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 206.74 (March 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-18.4(a1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
717db32ddbc091b8c52d4e680fec1fdaefaa821e6d2d1fdb75a8c620d7d388ef
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.