Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 206.31B

SECOND DEGREE MURDER, CAUSED BY CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. FELONY.

activein force · 2024-02-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: N.C.P.I.—Crim 206.31B Second Degree Murder,

Caused By Controlled Substance is replaced by N.C.P.I—Crim

206.76. Death by Distribution Through Unlawful Delivery with

Malice of Certain Controlled Substances. Use this instruction for

offenses prior to December 1, 2023. For offenses on or after

December 1, 2023 see N.C.P.I—Crim 206.76.

The defendant has been charged with second degree murder.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove

four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the victim's death was caused by ingesting (name

substance).1

Second, that the defendant intentionally and unlawfully distributed that

(name substance).2

Third, that the defendant's unlawful distribution of that (name

substance) was a proximate cause of the victim's death. A proximate cause is

a real cause, a cause without which the victim's death would not have

occurred, and one that a reasonably careful and prudent person could foresee

would probably produce such [injury] [damage] or some similar injurious

result. (The defendant’s act need not have been the only cause, nor the last

or nearest cause. It is sufficient if it occurred with some other cause acting at

the same time, which, in combination with, caused the death of the victim.)

(A child has been killed if the child was born alive, but died as a result of

injuries inflicted prior to being born alive.)3

And Fourth, that the defendant unlawfully and with malice killed the

victim. Malice arises when an act that is inherently dangerous to human life is

done so recklessly and wantonly as to manifest a mind utterly without regard

for human life and social duty and deliberately bent on mischief.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant unlawfully and with malice killed the

victim by the intentional and unlawful distribution of (name substance), it

would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have

a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty

to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 206.31B (Replacement February 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-17. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
0b88f72607c047a4b21974b9250d6056c817be6e91c3f786a7596ad99783dcb3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.