NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 104.96
LIMITATION ON EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY.
NOTE WELL: Always give N.C.P.I.—Crim. 104.94 first
when this instruction is given. This instruction covers
the admissibility of expert opinion testimony
concerning all "syndromes" and "disorders," including,
but not limited to, post-traumatic stress syndrome,
rape-trauma syndrome, and conversion disorders. The
trial court should balance the probative value of
evidence of these conditions against the prejudicial
impact of such evidence under Rule 403, and it should
determine whether admission of evidence of these
conditions would be helpful to the trier of fact under
Rule 702. See State v. Hall, 330 N.C. 808, 412 S.E.2d
883 (1992).
You may consider expert opinion testimony that one
a) [[exhibits symptoms] [fits a profile] consistent with [sexual]
[physical] abuse]
b) [suffers from [post-traumatic stress syndrome] [rape-trauma
syndrome]]
c) [had a conversion [reaction] [disorder] consistent with [sexual]
[physical] abuse]
only for the limited purpose1 of corroborating the victim’s 2 testimony at
this trial, that is, you believe this opinion testimony supports the
testimony of the victim. The opinion testimony is admitted solely for this
purpose.3 You may not convict the defendant solely on this opinion
testimony.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 104.96 (Replacement June 2021). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
2cbbfc9b624eabf09e5d116eef38cc95395272422cbac291545c421f6f8bf0cf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.