Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 104.13

TRANSFERRED INTENT.

activein force · 2019-06-01 – presentas-observed

If the defendant intended to harm one person but instead harmed a

different person, the legal effect would be the same as if the defendant

had harmed the intended victim.1

(If a killing of the intended person would be with malice, then the

killing of the different person would also be with malice.)

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 104.13 (Replacement June 2019). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
79b1536f85ec46fb39224ac586fcf0b038ad6c3a75c00e4f325fcaac078483ba
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.