Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 880.26

CONCEALMENT IN APPLICATION FOR NON-MARINE INSURANCE.

activein force · 2005-05-01 – presentas-observed

The (state number) issue reads:

"Did the [plaintiff] [defendant] intentionally conceal a material fact

in applying for the policy of insurance?"

On this issue the burden of proof is on the [plaintiff] [defendant]

insurance company. This means that the insurance company must prove,

by the greater weight of the evidence, that the [plaintiff] [defendant]

intentionally concealed a material fact in applying for the policy of

insurance.

The law provides that the concealment of a fact from an insurance

company will [prevent a recovery on the policy] [entitle the insurance

company to rescind the policy] if the fact is material and the concealment

of that fact was intentional. A fact is material if the knowledge or

ignorance of it would naturally and reasonably influence the judgment of

the insurance company either in making the insurance contract, in

estimating the degree and character of the risk, or in establishing the

premium.2 A concealment is intentional 3 if the applicant knew that the

fact concealed was material and concealed it with the purpose of

deceiving the insurance company. Where an applicant believes in good

faith that the information does not have to be disclosed or believes in

good faith that it is not material, he has not intentionally concealed a

material fact.

Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the [plaintiff]

[defendant] insurance company has the burden of proof, if you find, by

the greater weight of the evidence, that the [plaintiff] [defendant]

intentionally concealed a material fact in applying for the policy of

insurance, then it would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor

of the [plaintiff] [defendant] insurance company. If, on the other hand,

you fail so to find,

then it would be your duty to answer this issue "No" in favor of the

[plaintiff] [defendant].

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 880.26 (May 2005). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
ac1039e25c255e2dcc264852d6eec29353235aaffd617a191e4131d19e318949
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.