NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 855.16
FORECLOSURE - ACTION FOR DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT-DEFENSE OF MORTGAGOR TO DEFEAT AND OFFSET DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT- TRUE VALUE OF PROPERTY ON DATE OF FORECLOSURE SALE.
NOTE WELL: A sample verdict form and a judge’s
worksheet to use for deficiency judgment actions are
available at N.C.P.I.-Civil 855.18.
The [fourth] [(state number)] issue reads:
“What was the true value of (identify property) on (date of
foreclosure sale)?”
You will answer this issue only if you have answered Issue [Three]
[(state number)] “Yes,” in favor of the defendant.
On this issue the burden of proof is on the defendant.2 This means
that the defendant must prove by the greater weight of the evidence the
true value of (identify property) on (date of foreclosure sale).3 As
previously instructed, the term “true value” means the amount that would
be agreed upon as a fair price by a seller who wishes to sell, but is not
compelled to do so, and a buyer who wishes to buy, but is not compelled
to do so.4
Once you have found by the greater weight of the evidence the true
value of (identify property) on (date of foreclosure sale), you will write
that amount in the blank space on the verdict form.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 855.16 (March 2016). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 45-21.36. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
5b606d233ea04ea24647df78a9f4f84c2d3d208e9f55affb3556f8fcefe2fb4b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.