NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 850.05
DEEDS - ACTION TO SET ASIDE - LACK OF MENTAL CAPACITY.
The (state number) issue reads:
"Did (name grantor) lack sufficient mental capacity to [execute]
[deliver] the (identify deed) to (name grantee)?"
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. 1 This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, that
(name grantor) did not possess sufficient mental capacity to [execute]
[deliver] the (identify deed).2
A grantor must have sufficient mental capacity to understand what
he is conveying, the person to whom he is conveying, the purpose for
which the conveyance is being made, and the nature, scope and
consequences of his act.3 A grantor may have sufficient mental capacity
although he does not act wisely or discretely, or drive a good bargain.4 A
grantor may also have sufficient mental capacity even if suffering from
mental weakness or infirmity.5
Finally, as to the (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that
(name grantor) lacked sufficient mental capacity to [execute] [deliver]
the (identify deed) to (name grantee), then it would be your duty to
answer this issue "Yes" in favor of the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue "No" in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 850.05 (May 2002). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
d6e3219318130fab37395433142bbddddf53457ef11cf8388142a322383ad6c2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.