Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 845.10

SUMMARY EJECTMENT - HOLDING OVER AFTER THE END OF THE LEASE PERIOD.

activein force · 1993-02-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: Use this instruction when the term of the

lease has ended but the tenant is still in possession of

the premises. If the tenant has breached the lease

and is being sued before the end of the lease term, use

either N.C.P.I.-Civil 845.00 or 845.05.

This issue reads:

"Is the landlord entitled to possession of the leased premises?"

On this issue the burden of proof is on the landlord. This means

that the landlord must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,

three things:

First, that the tenant took possession of the premises under a

lease with the landlord.1 A lease is a contract for the exclusive

possession of a premises. A lease may be written or verbal.2

Second, that the lease

[by its terms ended on (state date).]

[was terminated3 by the landlord effective (state date). To

terminate the lease effective (state date), the landlord must have given

the tenant

(two days prior notice before the end of the week because the

tenant's tenancy is from week to week)

(seven days prior notice before the end of the month because the

tenant's tenancy is from month to month)

(thirty days prior notice before the end of the year because the

tenant's tenancy is from year to year)

(thirty days prior notice before the end of the [week] [month]

[year] because the premises rented by the tenant is a mobile home

space)

(state prior notice required by the lease)].

The notice given by the landlord need not be in any particular form,

and may be written or verbal.4 It must be sufficient to put the tenant on

notice that the lease will terminate at the end of the period and that the

tenant must vacate at that time.5]

And third, that the tenant did not vacate the premises after (state

date).6

Finally, as to this issue on which the landlord has the burden of

proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the landlord

is entitled to possession of the leased premises, then it would be your

duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor of the landlord.

If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty

to answer this issue "No" in favor of the tenant.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 845.10 (February 1993). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
261774d03b04d5d53302357a5b03a81e7e2afe4618f0dfc645592c6323666e8b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.C.P.I.—Civil 845.10 — SUMMARY EJECTMENT - HOLDING O… · binding.law