NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 835.20A
EMINENT DOMAIN - ISSUE OF JUST COMPENSATION-TAKING OF AN EASEMENT BY PRIVATE OR LOCAL PUBLIC CONDEMNORS - FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTY TAKEN.
NOTE WELL: Use this instruction only where an
easement is taken, the evidence relates to the fair
market value of the easement taken and there is no
evidence as to the value of the owner's property before
and after the taking. These proceedings involve only
private or local public condemnors pursuant to Chapter
40A of the North Carolina General Statutes.
The issue reads:
"What is the amount of just compensation the [plaintiff(s)]
[defendant(s)] [is] [are] entitled to recover from the [plaintiff]
[defendant] for the taking of the easement on the [plaintiff('s)(s')]
[defendant('s))s')] property?"
On this issue the burden of proof is on the [plaintiff(s)]
[defendant(s)]1. This means that the [plaintiff(s)] [defendant(s)] must
prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, the amount of just
compensation owed by the [plaintiff] [defendant] for the taking of the
easement.
In this case, the [plaintiff] [defendant] has not taken all of the
[plaintiff('s)(s')] [defendant('s)(s')] property. It has taken an easement or
right-of-way over the [plaintiff('s)(s')] [defendant('s)(s')] property. Where
an easement is taken for (state purpose), the landowner does not give up
all the title to his land.2 The landowner retains a right to continue to use
his land in ways that do not interfere with (name condemnor's) free
exercise of the easement acquired.3 The measure of just compensation
to which the [plaintiff(s)] [defendant(s)] [is] [are] entitled is the fair
market value of the easement at the time of the taking.4
Fair market value for an easement is the amount which would be
agreed upon as a fair price for an easement by an owner who wishes to
sell, but is not compelled to do so, and a buyer who wishes to buy, but is
not compelled to do so.
You must find the fair market value of the easement as of the time
of the taking- that is (state date of taking)- and not as of the present
day or any other time.5 In arriving at the fair market value, you should,
in light of all the evidence, consider not only the use of the property at
the time of the taking,6 but also all the uses to which it was then
reasonably adaptable, including what you find to be the highest and best
use or uses.7 You should consider these factors in the same way in which
they would be considered by a willing buyer and a willing seller in arriving
at a fair price.8 You should not consider purely imaginative or speculative
uses and values.
(The fair market value of the property taken does not include any
[increase] [decrease] in value before (state date of taking) caused by
[the proposed (state improvement or project) for which the property was
taken] [the reasonable likelihood that the property would be acquired for
(state proposed improvement or project)] [the condemnation proceeding
in which the property was taken].)9
(In determining the fair market value of the property, you may
consider any decrease in value before the date of the taking caused by
physical deterioration of the property within the reasonable control of the
landowner and by his unjustified neglect.)10
(If the [plaintiff(s)] [defendant(s)] [is] [are] allowed to remove
[timber] [a building] [(state other permanent improvement)] from the
property, the value of the [timber] [building] [(state other permanent
improvement)] shall not be included in the compensation you award.
However, the cost of the removal of the [timber] [building] [(state other
permanent improvement)] shall be added to the compensation.)11
Your verdict must not include any amount for interest.12 Any
interest as the law allows will be added by the court to your verdict.
I instruct you that your verdict on this issue must be based upon
the evidence and the rules of law I have given you. You are not required
to accept the amount suggested by the parties or their attorneys.
Finally, as to this issue on which the [plaintiff(s)] [defendant(s)]
[has] [have] the burden of proof, if you find, by the greater weight of the
evidence, the fair market value of the easement at the time of the
taking- that is (state date of taking)- then you will answer this issue by
writing that amount in dollars and cents in the blank space provided.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 835.20A (May 2006). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 40A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
86e26cecfa56c4dd086b9caf628a00cb8615178915d368303c0b569349abf67f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.