Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 835.10

EMINENT DOMAIN - ISSUE OF JUST COMPENSATION-TOTAL TAKING BY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OR BY MUNICIPALITY FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES.

activein force · 2020-04-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: This instruction should only be given

when the entire tract is taken and the condemnor is

the Department of Transportation exercising its right of

eminent domain pursuant to Chapter 136 of the General

Statutes or a municipality acquiring rights-of-way for

the state highway system pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §

136-66.3(c) and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 40A-3(b)(1).

The issue reads:

"What is the amount of just compensation the landowner is

entitled to recover from the [plaintiff] [defendant] for the taking of the

landowner’s property?"

On this issue the burden of proof is on the landowner.1 This means

that the landowner must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,

the amount of just compensation owed by the [plaintiff] [defendant] for

the taking of the landowner’s property.

In this case, the [plaintiff] [defendant] has taken all of the

landowner’s property.2 The measure of just compensation to which the

landowner is entitled is the fair market value of the property as of the

time of the taking.3

Fair market value is the amount which would be agreed upon as a

fair price by an owner who wishes to sell, but is not compelled to do so,

and a buyer who wishes to buy, but is not compelled to do so.

You must find the fair market value as of the time of the taking –

that is, as of (state date of taking) and not as of the present day or any

other time.4 In arriving at the fair market value you should, in light of all

the evidence, consider not only the use of the property at the time of the

taking,5 but also all of the uses to which it was then reasonably

adaptable, including what you find to be the highest and best use or

uses.6 You should consider these factors in the same way in which they

would be considered by a willing buyer and a willing seller in arriving at a

fair price.7 You should not consider purely imaginative or speculative

uses and values.

Your verdict must not include any amount for interest.8 Any

interest as the law allows will be added by the court to your verdict.

I instruct you that your verdict on this issue must be based upon

the evidence and the rules of law I have given you. You are not required

to accept the amount suggested by the parties or their attorneys.

Finally, as to this issue on which the landowner has the burden of

proof, if you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, the fair market

value of the property at the time of the taking, then you will answer this

issue by writing that amount in the blank space provided.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 835.10 (April 2020). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
f18015c583eed6f61bc59ec233179e7ed2af6a29ca4a2a199d4a6a74400f7b3f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.