NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 815.29
VOIDABLE MARRIAGE (ANNULMENT) - ISSUE OF UNDUE INFLUENCE.
NOTE WELL: If one of the parties to the marriage has
died, submission of N.C.P.I.-Civil 815.30 may also be
necessary.3
The (state number) issue reads:
Was the consent of the [plaintiff] [deceased]4 to marry the
defendant procured by the undue influence of the defendant5 over the
[plaintiff] [deceased]?
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,6 that
at the time of the [plaintiff's] [deceased's] marriage to the defendant,
the [plaintiff's] [deceased's] consent to marry the defendant was
procured by the undue influence of the defendant over the [plaintiff]
[deceased].
Undue influence occurs when a person's professed act is not his
own, but is in fact the act of the person exerting the influence. 7 Undue
influence exists where there has been such an influence over the mind
and will of another that his consent to marry is not freely given, but is in
reality the act of the person procuring the marriage.8
The undue influence must have existed and must have acted upon
the free will of the [plaintiff] [deceased] at the precise time of the
marriage ceremony.9
The existence of undue influence is for you to determine from all
the facts and circumstances in evidence. You may consider, together with
all the other facts and circumstances in evidence, the [plaintiff's]
[deceased's]:
[age]
[physical condition]
[mental condition]
[[dependence upon] [association with] [relationship with] the
defendant]
[state any other relevant factors supported by the evidence].10
(Undue influence does not necessarily involve moral turpitude or
even a bad or improper motive).11
(Mere persuasion, without more, is not undue influence. A person
may use fair argument and persuasion to induce another to consent to
marry.)12 (Influence gained by kindness and affection, without more, is
not undue, even if it induces a person to consent to marry.)13
Finally, as to this issue on which the plaintiff has the burden of
proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the consent
of the [plaintiff] [deceased] to marry the defendant was procured by the
undue influence of the defendant over the [plaintiff] [deceased] at the
time of the marriage ceremony, then it would be your duty to answer this
issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue “No” in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 815.29 (May 2006). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e30cbadfb5ba33577386d9a47a8099b88b42b6f137afcd3a151df3830f4368d4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.