Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 815.28

VOIDABLE MARRIAGE (ANNULMENT) - ISSUE OF LACK OF SUFFICIENT MENTAL CAPACITY AND UNDERSTANDING.

activein force · 1999-01-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: If one of the parties to the marriage has

died, also give N.C.P.I.-Civil 815.30.2

The (state number) issue reads:

"Did (name person) lack sufficient mental capacity and

understanding on (state date of marriage) to marry (name other

person)?"

On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. 3 This means

that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, that

at the time of [(name person's)] marriage to (name other person), he

lacked the mental capacity and understanding sufficient to enter into a

valid marriage.

Each person entering into a marriage relationship must have the

mental capacity to understand the nature of the contract of marriage and

the duties and responsibilities of a married person. This does not mean

that the person must actually know in detail the various legal

consequences of a marriage, but only that the person be mentally

capable of understanding that a husband and wife have duties to each

other, and that the marriage will legally affect their respective property

rights.4

Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has

the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that

(name person) lacked sufficient mental capacity and understanding on

(state date of marriage) to marry (name other person), then it would be

your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor of the plaintiff.

If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, it would be your duty to

answer this issue "No" in favor of the defendant.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 815.28 (January 1999). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
65d4a905941d45f7d8a073982d45535cc566902a898d77852b7e0121f19f4979
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.