Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 815.27

VOIDABLE MARRIAGE (ANNULMENT) - ISSUE OF DURESS.

activein force · 2006-05-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: If one of the parties to the marriage has

died, submission of N.C.P.I.-Civil 815.30 may also be

necessary.3

The (state number) issue reads:

“Was the consent of the [plaintiff] [deceased]4 to marry the

defendant procured by duress?”

On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means the

plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,5 that at the

time of the [plaintiff's] [deceased's] marriage to the defendant, the

[plaintiff's] [deceased's] consent to marry the defendant was procured by

duress.

Duress occurs where, by the wrongful act or threat or coercion of

another,6 a person is [induced][forced] to make a contract, or to perform

or forego some act, under circumstances which deprive that person of the

exercise of free will7 and his will is actually overcome.8 Duress may exist

even though that person is fully aware of all the facts material to his

decision.9

The duress must have existed and must have acted upon the free

will of the [plaintiff] [deceased] at the precise time of the marriage

ceremony.10

The existence of duress is for you to determine from all the

evidence. You may consider, together with all the other facts and

circumstances in evidence, the [plaintiff's] [deceased's]:11

[age]

[physical condition]

[mental condition]

[access to or opportunity to receive independent advice]

[relationship with the person [making the threat] [exerting

coercion]]

[state any other relevant factors supported by the evidence].

You may also consider:

[the degree to which the [plaintiff] [deceased] was in personal

distress or an emergency situation]12

[the intent13 of the person [making the threat] [exerting

coercion]]14

[whether alternatives to marriage were reasonably available to the

[plaintiff] [deceased]15

[the source of the power of the person [making the threat]

[exerting coercion]].16

Finally, as to this issue on which the plaintiff has the burden of

proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the consent

of the [plaintiff][deceased] to marry the defendant was procured by

duress at the time of the marriage ceremony, then it would be your duty

to answer this issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff.

If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty

to answer this issue “No” in favor of the defendant.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 815.27 (May 2006). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
b4089c1710dcece23d26e9c78c8004c6f259dc6ed4a1924ea3269b880a9c6ac7
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.