Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 814.80

FRAUDULENT TRANSFER - PRESENT CREDITORS - TRANSFER TO INSIDER WHILE INSOLVENT - DEFENSE OF NEW VALUE GIVEN.

activein force · 2017-02-01 – presentas-observed

The (state number) issue reads:

“Did the defendant give new value to or for the benefit of (name

debtor) after the transfer was made?”

You will answer this issue1 only if you have answered the (state

number) issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff.

On this issue the burden of proof is on the defendant. This means

the defendant must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, that he

gave new value2 to or for the benefit of (name debtor) after the transfer

was made.3

Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the defendant has

the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that

the defendant gave new value to or for the benefit of (name debtor) after

the transfer was made, then it would be your duty to answer this issue

“Yes” in favor of the defendant.

If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty

to answer this issue “No” in favor of the plaintiff.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 814.80 (February 2017). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 39-23.8(f)(1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
c98e6f2c415806bda18e368009704cda3face5b8ed1253d03ec7ba0f6d796c50
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.