NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 810.94
PUNITIVE DAMAGES - ISSUE OF WHETHER TO MAKE AWARD AND AMOUNT. (SPECIAL CASES).
NOTE WELL: Use this instruction in conjunction with
all claims for relief arising prior to January 1, 1996.
Claims for relief arising on or after January 1, 1996 are
governed by N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1D-1 et seq., effective
January 1, 1996. For such cases, use N.C.P.I.-Civil
810.98.
Caveat: This instruction should not be used except in those
infrequent cases where special evidentiary1 or procedural2 considerations
make it prudent to do so.
The (state number) issue reads:
"What amount of punitive damages, if any, does the jury in its
discretion award to the plaintiff?"
You are to answer this issue only if you have answered (identify
issues and specify answers necessary for a consideration of this issue).
Whether to award punitive damages is a matter within the sound
discretion of the jury.3 Punitive damages are not awarded for the purpose
of compensating the plaintiff for his [injury] [damage], nor are they
awarded as a matter of right. In deciding whether to award punitive
damages, you must determine that there is a need to punish the
defendant for his conduct, or to deter the defendant or others from
engaging in this or similar conduct in the future, or to make an example
out of the defendant.
Furthermore, if you decide, in your discretion, to award punitive
damages, any amount you award must bear a rational relationship4 to the
sum reasonably needed to punish the defendant for his conduct, or to
deter the defendant or others from engaging in this or similar conduct in
the future, or to make an example out of the defendant. In determining
such amount, you may consider such of the following factors as are
supported by the evidence:5
NOTE WELL: Either plaintiff or defendant may produce
evidence as to factors 1 through 10;6 factors 11 and 12
are mitigating factors as to which only the defendant
should be allowed to produce evidence.
[(1) the [injury] [damage] which occurred from the defendant's
conduct]
[(2) the [injury] [damage] which could have occurred from the
defendant's conduct]
[(3) the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's conduct]
[(4) the duration of the defendant's conduct]
[(5) the defendant's awareness of the nature and character of his
conduct]
[(6) the defendant's awareness of the probable consequences of his
conduct]
[(7) any concealment by the defendant of the facts or
consequences of his conduct]
[(8) the existence and frequency of any similar past conduct by the
defendant]
[(9) whether or not the defendant profited from his conduct and, if
so, whether that profit should be taken away]
[(10) the financial status or position of the defendant]7
[(11) whether the defendant has already been punished, in whole
or in part, by criminal sanctions]
[(12) whether the defendant has already been punished or is likely
to be punished through other civil actions involving the same or similar
conduct].
You may consider such other factors as arise logically and fairly
from the evidence presented.
Finally, if you determine, in your discretion, to award punitive
damages, then, considering those factors which are supported by the
evidence, you may award to the plaintiff an amount which bears a
rational relationship to the sum reasonably needed to punish the
defendant, or to deter the defendant or others from engaging in this or
similar conduct in the future, or to make an example out of the
defendant. That amount should be written in the space provided on the
verdict sheet.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 810.94 (May 1996). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
4e455a55fb6323b7377e4cfafeecdbc6ee5d34515dec533a1d5faf2b9c75acde
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.