NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 810.54
WRONGFUL DEATH DAMAGES - FINAL MANDATE (REGULAR).
(For medical malpractice cases filed on or after 1
October 2011, use N.C.P.I.-Civil 809.154. Use N.C.P.I.-
Civil 810.56 in place of N.C.P.I.-Civil 810.54 when a per
diem argument has been made.)
I instruct you that your findings on the (state number) issue must
be based on the evidence and the rules of law I have given you with
respect to the measure of damages.1 You are not required to accept the
amount of damages suggested by the parties or their attorneys.
Your award must be fair and just. You should remember that you
are not seeking to punish either party, and you are not awarding or
withholding anything on the basis of sympathy or pity.
Finally, as to the (state number) issue on which the estate has the
burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence the
amount of actual damages [proximately caused by the negligence]
[caused by the wrongful conduct] of the defendant, then it would be your
duty to write that amount in the blank space provided.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to write a nominal sum such as “One Dollar” in the blank space provided.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 810.54 (June 2012). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
60d5c86cdc6ad2cec47f9e81d1d01b488be1c7eb2fb39c25b88f5d9a76cecd95
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.