NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 810.32
PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES - PARENT’S CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENT OR WRONGFUL INJURY TO MINOR CHILD.
NOTE WELL: Although the claims of a parent and an
injured child as a result of a single act of negligent or
wrongful conduct can be joined under N.C. Gen. Stat. §
1A-1, Rule 20, they remain separate damage issues.
The (state number) issue reads:
“What amount is (state name of parent) entitled to recover for the
personal injury1 to (state name of child)?”
If you have answered the (state issue number) issue in favor of
(state name child), (state name of parent) is entitled to nominal
damages even without proof of actual damages. Nominal damages
consist of some trivial amount such as one dollar in recognition of the
technical damages incurred by (state name of parent).
(State name of parent) may also be entitled to recover actual
damages. On this issue the burden of proof is on (state of name parent).
This means (state name of parent) must prove, by the greater weight of
the evidence, the amount of actual damages [proximately caused by the
negligence] [caused by the wrongful conduct] of the defendant. (State
name of parent) is entitled to fair compensation for the actual
[loss of services of (state name of child)]
[loss of earnings of (state name of child)]
[necessary expenses incurred for medical treatment of (state name
of child)’s injuries]
[proximately caused by the negligence] [caused by the wrongful
conduct] of the defendant.
In considering this issue, you must not duplicate any damages you
have already awarded to (state name of child). Thus, any damages you
award (state name of parent) may not include any compensation which
can only be claimed by (state name of child), such as [loss of earnings
after the age of majority] [scars or disfigurement] [loss (of use) of part of
the body] [pain and suffering] [permanent injury] [state any other type of
damage at issue in child’s case-in-chief]. You must limit your
consideration to (state name of parent)’s actual [loss of services of
(state name of child)] [loss of earnings of (state name of child)]
[necessary expenses incurred for medical treatment of (state of name
child)’s injuries]. The total of all damages are to be awarded in one lump
sum. I will now explain the law of damages as it relates to each of
these.
[Loss of Services. A parent is entitled to the services of his child
during minority.2 Where the child’s services are lost as a [proximate
result of the negligence] [result of the wrongful conduct] of a person, the
parent is entitled to fair compensation. Loss of services, whether
voluntary or obligatory, includes the monetary value of reasonably
expected services, protection, care and assistance from the child.3
[Loss of Earnings. A parent is entitled to the earnings of his child
during minority. Where these earnings are lost as a [proximate result of
the negligence] [result of the wrongful conduct] of a person, the parent is
entitled to fair compensation. Loss of earnings includes the amount the
child would have earned but for the [loss of time] [the inability to work]
[the reduced capacity to earn money] [proximately caused by the
negligence] [caused by the wrongful conduct] of another. You may
consider:
[the child's age and occupation]
[the nature and extent of the child’s employment]
[the value of the child’s services]
[the amount of the child’s income from fixed salary or wages at the
time of his injury]
[disability or disfigurement affecting the child’s earning capacity]
[loss of profits from the child’s business or profession]
[specify any other factor supported by the evidence].]
[Necessary Medical Expenses. A parent is under a duty to support
his child during minority, including a duty to care for the child.4 As such,
a parent is liable for any necessary medical treatment received by the
child. Thus, a parent is entitled to fair compensation for any reasonably
necessary medical expenses for the child [proximately resulting from the
negligence] [resulting from the wrongful conduct] of a person. Medical
expenses include the actual amounts paid or incurred by the parent for
hospital, doctors’ and drug bills, and other reasonably necessary medical
expenses.]
You are instructed that (state name of parent) is entitled to recover
for [the loss of services of (state name of child)] [the loss of earnings of
(state name of child)] [the necessary expenses incurred for the medical
treatment of (state of name child)’s injuries] only for so long as (state
name of child) is a minor. Once (state name of child) [attains the age of
eighteen] [becomes emancipated]5, (state name of parent) is no longer
entitled to [(state name of child)’s services] [(state name of child)’s
earnings] [reimbursement for (state name of child)’s necessary medical
expenses]6.
Any damages you award (state name of parent) must be limited to the
period of time before (state name of child) [turns eighteen] [becomes
emancipated].
(Use the next paragraph only if there is evidence which would
justify a finding that services or earnings will be lost or additional
medical expenses will be incurred in the future: [Lost services] [Lost
earnings] [Necessary medical expenses] also include the amount which
you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, will hereafter [be lost]
[be paid or incurred by (state name of parent) for necessary medical
expenses] as a [proximate result of the negligence] [result of the
wrongful conduct] of the defendant until the time (state name of child)
reaches eighteen. However, any amount you allow for future [lost
services] [lost earnings] [necessary medical expenses] must be reduced
to its present value, because a smaller sum received now is equal to a
larger sum received in the future. These future losses are limited to the
period from now until the child reaches the age of eighteen.) (There is
evidence before you that (state name of parent)’s actual damages for
future [lost services] [lost earnings] [necessary medical expenses] have
already been reduced to their present value. Whether they have in fact
been so reduced is for you to determine from the evidence and from your
logic and common sense. However, if you find that (state name of
parent)’s actual damages for future [lost services] [lost earnings]
[necessary medical expenses] have already been reduced to present
value, you must not reduce them again.))
I instruct you that your findings on the (state issue number) issue
must be based upon the evidence and the rules of law I have given you
with respect to the measure of damages. You are not required to accept
the amount of damages suggested by the parties or their attorneys. Your
award must be fair and just. You should remember that you are not
seeking to punish either party, and you are not awarding or withholding
anything on the basis of sympathy or pity.
Finally, as to the (state issue number) issue on which (state name
of parent) has the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of
the evidence the amount of actual damages [proximately caused by the
negligence] [caused by the wrongful conduct] of the defendant, then it
would be your duty to write that amount in the blank space provided.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to write a nominal sum such as “One Dollar” in the blank space provided.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 810.32 (June 2010). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
06fae0e6321269064e458a8905726bb0a024e8fb3beab594a9248167012bb56a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.