NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 809.65A
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE - HEALTH CARE PROVIDER’S LIABILITY FOR ACTS OF NON-EMPLOYEE AGENTS - RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR.
(Use for claims arising on or after 1 October 2011. For
claims arising before 1 October 2011, use N.C.P.I.-Civil
809.65.) 2
The (state number) issue reads:
“Was (name nurse, attendant, other person) the agent of the
defendant at the time the (describe health care service) was
performed?”3
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, that
(name nurse, attendant, other person) was the defendant's agent at the
time the (describe health care service) was performed.
Ordinarily, a health care provider4 is not liable for the negligence of
[nurses] [attendants] [(name other persons)] who are not the health care
provider’s employees. However, where, in the preparation and
performance of [a medical treatment] [an operation] [(describe other
procedure)] the health care provider has full control and supervision of
the [nurse] [attendant] [(name other person)], such person becomes an
agent and the health care provider is liable for any negligence of that
agent which proximately causes the [injury] [damage]. The [nurse]
[attendant] [(name other person)] is the agent of the health care
provider only if, at the time the (describe health care service) was
performed, the health care provider possesses the power to control
directly and supervise the [nurse] [attendant] [(name other person)]
while performing the (state health care service). The [nurse] [attendant]
[(name other person)] will be considered an agent of the health care
provider if the health care provider possesses this power of supervising
the manner of acting whether or not the power is exercised. (The duties
of the health care provider with respect to such supervision and control
over such agents are substantially the same as those respecting the
other phases of the treatment of the patient generally; that is, in
supervising agents, the health care provider is bound
[to exercise [his] [her] best judgment in the treatment and care of
[his] [her] patient]5
[NOTE WELL: This duty does not apply in cases in
which the jury has before it only a corporate or
administrative medical malpractice claim, pursuant to
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.12(a) (N.C.P.I.–Civil 809.06).]
[to use reasonable care and diligence in the application of [his]
[her] knowledge and skill to [his] [her] patient's care]6
[NOTE WELL: This duty does not apply in cases
involving only a corporate or administrative medical
malpractice claim. See prior NOTE WELL.]
[and]
[to follow the standards of practice among health care providers
with similar training and experience situated in the same or similar
communities under the same or similar circumstances7 at the time the
health care service was rendered].8)
Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find, by the greater weight of the evidence,
that (name nurse, attendant, other person) was the agent of the
defendant at the time the (state health care service) was performed,
then it would be your duty to answer this issue “Yes” in favor of the
plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue “No” in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 809.65A (Replacement May 2019). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8885b78ad248145d6b5065457971b8943b2079773002a20ece0f17f3c8332ff0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.