NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 806.85
DEFAMATION - PRIVATE FIGURE-MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN - ISSUE OF ACTUAL MALICE.
NOTE WELL: If a private figure plaintiff in a matter of
public concern seeks to recover punitive damages, the
following issue must first be answered in the
affirmative.2 If, and only if, this issue is answered
"Yes," then the standard punitive damages
instructions, N.C.P.I.—Civil 810.96 (“Punitive Damages
—Liability of Defendant”) and 810.98 (“Punitive
Damages—Issue of Whether to Make Award and
Amount”), should be given.
The (state number) issue reads:
"Did the defendant publish the [libelous] [slanderous] statement
with actual malice?”
You will answer this issue only if you have answered the (state
issue number) "Yes") in favor of the plaintiff.
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by clear, strong and convincing evidence,
that the defendant published the [libelous] [slanderous] statement with
actual malice.3
Clear, strong and convincing evidence is evidence which, in its
character and weight, establishes what the plaintiff seeks to prove in a
clear, strong and convincing fashion. You shall interpret and apply the
words "clear," "strong" and "convincing" in accordance with their
commonly understood and accepted meanings in everyday speech.
Actual malice means that, at the time of the publication of the
[libelous] [slanderous] statement, the defendant either knew that the
statement was false or acted with reckless disregard of whether the
statement was false.4 Reckless disregard means that, at the time of the
publication, the defendant had serious doubts about whether the
statement was true.5
Finally, as to this issue on which the plaintiff has the burden of
proof, if you find by clear, strong and convincing evidence that the
defendant published the [libelous] [slanderous] statement with actual
malice, then it would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor of
the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue "No" in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 806.85 (June 2021). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
b346fba653dc990902f5e6822a71fc8a3fcf0d91e2ef5133054a2ac45d871b0c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.