NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 806.03
CONVERSION - DEFENSE OF GIFT.
The (state number) issue reads:
"Did the plaintiff make a gift of the (name personal property) to the
defendant?"
On this issue the burden of proof is on the defendant. This means
that the defendant must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,
two things:
First, that the plaintiff had the intent 2 to give up all his ownership
and control of the (name personal property) immediately.3 Intent is a
determination to act in a certain way or to do a certain thing. Every
person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable
consequences of his voluntary actions.
And Second, that the plaintiff [actually] [constructively] delivered
the (name personal property) to the defendant. 4 [Actual delivery occurs
when there is a direct transfer to another of ownership and control of
something.] [Constructive delivery occurs when, although there is no
actual delivery, ownership and control of something is indirectly
transferred.5]
Finally, as to this issue on which the defendant has the burden of
proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the plaintiff
made a gift of the (name personal property) to the defendant, then it
would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor of the defendant.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue "No" in favor of the plaintiff.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 806.03 (April 2004). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
526a104187f54c0bec8181148944eb774b26e06eea8008b2fe26242c2c2f7dd0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.