NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 805.64
DUTY OF OWNER TO TRESPASSER - INTENTIONAL HARMS.
NOTE WELL: Use for claims arising on or after 1
October 2011. For claims arising before 1 October
2011, use N.C.P.I.-Civil 805.65.
If the defendant contends that the plaintiff trespasser
entered the land or building of the defendant owner,
possessor, lessee or other occupant of land with the
intent to commit a crime, then the instruction
regarding reasonable use of force also should be given
with this instruction. See N.C.P.I.-Civil 805.64A
The (state number) issue reads:
“Was the plaintiff’s [injury] [death] [caused by the willful or wanton
conduct of the defendant] [intentionally caused by the defendant]?”
(You will answer this issue only if you have answered the (state
number) issue “No” in favor of the defendant.2 If you answered the (state
number) issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff, you will answer the (state
number) issue and not this one.)3
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, [that
the defendant acted willfully or wantonly and that such willful or wanton
conduct resulted in the plaintiff’s [injury] [death]] [that the defendant
intentionally caused the plaintiff’s [injury] [death].]4
In North Carolina, the general rule is that [an owner] [a person in
possession] [a lessee] [an occupant] of land does not owe a duty of care
to a trespasser and is not subject to liability for any injury to a
trespasser.5
However,
[[An owner] [A person in possession] [A lessee] [An occupant]
of land is under a duty not to cause [injury] [death] to a
trespasser by willful or wanton conduct.6]
[[An owner] [A person in possession] [A lessee] [An occupant]
of land is under a duty to not intentionally cause [injury]
[death] to a trespasser.7]
[An owner] [A person in possession] [A lessee] [An occupant] of
land may be subject to liability if the trespasser’s [injury] [death],
[either:]
[resulted from the [owner’s] [possessor’s] [lessee’s]
[occupant’s] willful or wanton conduct;] [or]
[was intentionally caused by the [owner] [person in
possession] [lessee] [occupant] of the land.8]
[An act is willful if the [owner] [person in possession] [lessee]
[occupant] of the land intentionally9 fails to carry out a duty imposed by
law or contract which is necessary to protect the safety of persons or
property.10
[An act is wanton if the [owner] [person in possession] [lessee]
[occupant] of land acts in conscious or reckless disregard for the safety of
others.11]
[An act is intentional if the [owner] [person in possession] [lessee]
[occupant] of land intended to cause [injury] [death] to the plaintiff
trespasser.12 A person acts intentionally if he desires to cause the
consequences of his act or believes that the consequences are
substantially certain to occur.13 Intent may be proven by direct evidence
or inferred from the circumstances.]
(The [owner] [person in possession] [lessee] [occupant] of land is
not required to anticipate the presence of a trespasser.)
The plaintiff not only has the burden of proving the defendant’s
[willful or wanton] [intentional] conduct, but also that the plaintiff’s
[injury] [death] [resulted from the defendant’s willful or wanton conduct]
[was intentionally caused by the defendant].
As to this (state number) issue, the plaintiff contends, and the
defendant denies, that the defendant engaged in [willful or wanton]
[intentional] conduct in one or more of the following ways: (Read all
contentions of [willful or wanton] [intentional] conduct supported by the
evidence.)
The plaintiff further contends, and the defendant denies, that [the
plaintiff’s [injury] [death] resulted from the defendant’s willful or wanton
conduct] [the defendant’s intentional conduct caused the plaintiff’s
[injury] [death]].
I instruct you that [willful or wanton] [intentional] conduct is not to
be presumed from the mere fact of [injury] [death].
Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find, by the greater weight of the evidence,
that the defendant acted [willfully or wantonly] [intentionally] (in any one
or more of the ways contended by the plaintiff) and that [the plaintiff’s
[injury] [death] resulted from the defendant’s willful or wanton conduct]
[the defendant intentionally caused the plaintiff’s [injury] [death]], then
it would be your duty to answer this issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue “No” in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 805.64 (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 38B-3(1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
ac2ae990b9872d65c2b0481ba383ff6fc443a93e1459dc7889a413edaa5f0f7b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.