NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 804.08
EXCESSIVE FORCE IN MAKING ARREST - SECTION 1983 CLAIM-ISSUE OF LAWFULNESS OF ARREST.
NOTE WELL: This series of instructions is designed to
be used with 804.12 (“Excessive Force in Making Arrest
- Section 1983 Claim - Sample Verdict Sheet”).
The (state number) issue reads:
“Was the defendant’s arrest of the plaintiff unlawful?”1
If you have answered the second issue “Yes,” then you will consider
the third issue. If, on the other hand, you have answered the second
issue “No,” then you will not consider the remaining issues.
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, that
the defendant lacked probable cause to arrest the plaintiff.2 The law
defines probable cause as the facts and circumstances that an officer
knows, based upon reasonably trustworthy information, to be sufficient to
warrant a prudent person to believe that the suspect had committed or
was committing an offense.3
Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find, by the greater weight of the evidence,
that the defendant lacked probable cause to arrest the plaintiff, then it
would be your duty to answer this issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue “No” in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 804.08 (March 2016). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
b87e77f9847327dac147fa53fe80a12a68a1a71d6426908e7916604c0021b473
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.