NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 804.04
EXCESSIVE FORCE IN MAKING ARREST - COMMON LAW CLAIM FOR BATTERY - DAMAGES.
NOTE WELL: This series of instructions is designed to
be used with 804.05 (“Excessive Force in Making Arrest
- Common Law Claim for Battery - Sample Verdict
Sheet”).
NOTE WELL: If state law and federal law claims are
submitted to the jury, and if damages are returned as
to each, the plaintiff must elect between the awards.
The (state number) issue reads:
“What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover as a result of the
defendant’s battery?”
If you have answered either the second issue or the third issue
“Yes,” then you will consider the remaining issue(s). If, on the other
hand, you have answered the second issue and the third issue “No,” then
you will not consider the remaining issue(s).
If you have answered either the second issue (804.02-Excessive
Force in Making Arrest - Common Law Claim for Battery - Issue of
Lawfulness of Arrest) “Yes” or the third issue (804.03-Excessive Force in
Making Arrest - Common Law Claim for Battery - Issue of Reasonableness
of Force Used) “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff, then the plaintiff is entitled
to recover nominal damages even without proof of actual damages.1
Nominal damages consist of some trivial amount such as one dollar in
recognition of a technical injury to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff may also be entitled to recover actual damages. On
this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means that the
plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, the amount of
actual damages caused by the defendant’s battery.2
Actual damages are the fair compensation to be awarded to a
person for any [past] [present] [future] injury caused by the wrongful
conduct of another.
In determining the amount, if any, to award the plaintiff for actual
damages, you will consider the evidence you have heard as to (each of
the following types of damages):
[medical expenses]
[loss of earnings]
[pain and suffering]
[scars or disfigurement]
[(partial) loss (of use) of part of the body]
[permanent injury]
[state any other type of damage supported by the evidence].
The total of all damages is to be awarded in one lump sum.3
I will now explain the law of damages as it relates to each of these
types of damages.
NOTE WELL: Insert here the actual damages
instructions found in Chapter 12 (810.04 - 810.22 et
seq.) as supported by the evidence.
Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence the
amount of actual damages caused by the defendant’s battery, then it
would be your duty to write that amount in the blank space provided.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to write a nominal sum such as “One Dollar” in the blank space provided.
NOTE WELL: If instruction regarding punitive damages
is supported by the evidence, this instruction should be
followed by 810.96 (“Punitive Damages-Liability of
Defendant”) and 810.98 (“Issue of Whether to Make
Award and Amount of Award”). Note, too, that under
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1D-30, the issues of liability for and
amount of punitive damages may be tried separately
from the issues of liability for and amount of
compensatory damages upon the motion of a
defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 804.04 (March 2016). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
272b5b938d5246b273c9d5dec2c6f782bb693aa522348494c4ebedc6656c1ac0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.