NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.82
INVASION OF PRIVACY—USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM—NUMBER OF PHOTOGRAPHS.
The (state number) issue reads:
“How many photographs1 of the plaintiff were published or otherwise
publicly disseminated?”2
If you have answered the (state number) issue “Yes” in favor of the
plaintiff, then you must determine how many photographs of the plaintiff
taken by the defendant with an unmanned aircraft system without the
plaintiff’s consent were published or otherwise publicly disseminated. On this
issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means that the plaintiff must
prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, the number of photographs of
the plaintiff that were published or otherwise publicly disseminated. These
photographs must be photographs that were taken by the defendant, with an
unmanned aircraft system, without the plaintiff’s consent, and for the purpose
of publication or other public dissemination.
Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has the
burden of proof, it would be your duty to determine the number of
photographs of the plaintiff that were published or otherwise publicly
disseminated and write that number in the blank space provided.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.82 (May 2024). N.C.G.S. § 15A-300.1. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
58c81626545ccad4cf0384284d554ac640db981f2a2c702f8363e1cb228c700b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.