Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.75

INVASION OF PRIVACY-APPROPRIATION OF NAME OR LIKENESS FOR COMMERCIAL USE.

activein force · 2001-05-01 – presentas-observed

The (state number) issue reads:

"Did the defendant appropriate the [name] [likeness] of the

plaintiff for the defendant's own commercial use and benefit without the

plaintiff's consent?"

On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means

that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, two

things:2

First, that the defendant appropriated the plaintiff's [name]

[likeness] for the defendant's own commercial use and benefit. ("Name"

includes a person's reputation, prestige, social or commercial standing, or

other values publically associated with him.) ("Likeness" includes a

person's image, whether republished or rebroadcast by photograph,

drawing or caricature.)3

And Second, that the plaintiff did not consent to the defendant's

appropriation of his [name] [likeness].

Finally, as to this issue on which the plaintiff has the burden of

proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the

defendant appropriated the plaintiff's [name] [likeness] for the

defendant's own commercial use and benefit without the plaintiff's

consent, then it would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor of

the plaintiff.

If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty

to answer this issue "No" in favor of the defendant.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.75 (May 2001). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
8675bbafe1b8a34e847a4c95279a4bd58dbfa2d73c06d43a8849ee949d5cfa66
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.