NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.75
INVASION OF PRIVACY-APPROPRIATION OF NAME OR LIKENESS FOR COMMERCIAL USE.
The (state number) issue reads:
"Did the defendant appropriate the [name] [likeness] of the
plaintiff for the defendant's own commercial use and benefit without the
plaintiff's consent?"
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, two
things:2
First, that the defendant appropriated the plaintiff's [name]
[likeness] for the defendant's own commercial use and benefit. ("Name"
includes a person's reputation, prestige, social or commercial standing, or
other values publically associated with him.) ("Likeness" includes a
person's image, whether republished or rebroadcast by photograph,
drawing or caricature.)3
And Second, that the plaintiff did not consent to the defendant's
appropriation of his [name] [likeness].
Finally, as to this issue on which the plaintiff has the burden of
proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the
defendant appropriated the plaintiff's [name] [likeness] for the
defendant's own commercial use and benefit without the plaintiff's
consent, then it would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor of
the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue "No" in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.75 (May 2001). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8675bbafe1b8a34e847a4c95279a4bd58dbfa2d73c06d43a8849ee949d5cfa66
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.