Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.74

INVASION OF PRIVACY - DISCLOSURE OF PRIVATE IMAGES - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

activein force · 2022-05-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: This instruction1 is designed to be used

with N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.72 (“Invasion of Privacy –

Disclosure of Private Images”) and N.C.P.I.—Civil

800.73 (“Invasion of Privacy—Disclosure of Private

Images—Actual Damages”).

The (state number) issue reads:

“For how many days did the defendant disclose the plaintiff’s

private image?”2

If you have answered the (state number) issue “Yes” in favor of the

plaintiff, then you must determine for how many days the defendant

disclosed the plaintiff’s private image. On this issue, the burden of proof

is on the plaintiff. This means that the plaintiff must prove by the greater

weight of the evidence the number of days in total the defendant

transferred, published, distributed, or reproduced the plaintiff’s private

image.

Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has

the burdn of proof, it would be your duty to write the total number of

days that the defendant disclosed the plaintiff’s private image in the

blank space provided.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.74 (May 2022). N.C.G.S. § 14-190.5A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
afa4aff70ace820b8648d3238180c4a1d583fc9ff79658e52185d3426bfd79b5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.