NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.70
INVASION OF PRIVACY - OFFENSIVE INTRUSION.
The (state number) issue reads:
“Did the defendant intrude offensively upon the privacy of the
plaintiff?”2
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, three
things:
First, that the defendant intruded upon the privacy of the plaintiff.3
Such an intrusion occurs when the solitude, seclusion, private affairs or
personal concerns of a person are invaded.4 The invasion may be
physical5 or mental.6
Second, that the defendant's intrusion was intentional. An act is
intentional when it is done knowingly, or with purpose, or with reckless
indifference to its consequences.7
And Third, that a reasonable person, under the same or similar
circumstances, would be highly offended by such intrusion.8
Finally, as to the (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that
the defendant intruded offensively upon the privacy of the plaintiff, then
it would be your duty to answer this issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue “No” in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.70 (June 2013). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
16c45c54d57d0632dc4f7c8681c7ff10e2878169852b6e6c20fb136a97084543
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.